With that, you need a dongle, and not many of them can passthrough Lossless at 24-bit/48kHz. There are other issues, for example, the iPhone doesn’t support a 3.5mm headphone jack anymore, and you need a wired connection to start listening to Lossless songs. So even if people want to use more data to stream in Lossless, they will not hear the difference. Apple also didn’t implement a new wireless codec like Sony’s LDAC, which is able to stream up to 990kbps. Since most people only wear AirPods or other Bluetooth headphones, there’s a technology limitation: Bluetooth can’t stream that much data over the air. Also, over the past weeks, people are discovering that listening to Lossless songs is more difficult than it sounds – pun intended. With music streaming services like Deezer, Tidal, and Amazon Music offering CD quality or even Hi-Res Lossless, Apple doing the same isn’t a groundbreaking feature. It’s not about Lossless audio quality on Apple Music Back then, I said: Spatial Audio will be the key feature for Apple Music HiFi. In May, I wrote a piece about what I thought would be Apple’s great triumph if HiFi quality would really come to the platform. Over these months, I still believe Spotify has a lot of perks: its shareable features are amazing and Apple still doesn’t have anything closer to Spotify Connect, but with iOS 14.6 and Lossless and Spatial Audio features being introduced, Apple has finally taken the lead. At that time, I was amazed by the green side of the music streaming service battle. Here’s why.Įarly this year, I wrote about my one-month experience with Spotify. Even still, thanks to these new features, Apple is differentiating itself from other competing music streaming services and becoming the best platform around. Apple Music was updated in June with Lossless and Spatial Audio support after some catches and controversies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |